Monday, February 8, 2010

Eat Food. Not Too Much. Mostly Plants. -Michael Pollan

I never thought I would be writing a blog post about food! If you asked me 5 years ago, and certainly when I was in high school, if I thought I would be interested in nutrition, and even to write about it, I would have told you ... no way!

However, I have been on an interesting journey, along with my wife and boys, in the area of nutrition.  Some of the stimuli in pushing us on this journey include my reading of In Defense of Food, @Michael Pollan. (which has one of the best subtitles I've ever seen: Eat Food. Not Too Much. Mostly Plants.) Another involves some symptoms my wife and one of my sons began to experience. We wanted to to avoid putting lots of medications and artificial substances in our bodies, when it just might be better to address what we're putting in our bodies in the first place!


For now, I'll just share what I learned from Michael Pollan's book. He spends the first few chapters persuading the reader that his way of framing the issues are worth considering. Once this groundwork has been laid, and he does a good job, then he gets practical and prescriptive. Below, I'll give you exactly what those guidelines are.

My family hasn't been able to apply all of these guidelines yet, of course. The ones that we have made progress on are the following:
Only eat foods that your great-grandmother would recognize as foods. More specifically, avoid food products containing ingredients that are a) unfamiliar, b) unpronounceable, c) more than five in number, or that include d) high-fructose corn syrup
All of these are indicators that the "food product" in question is very likely to be highly processed. 
Avoid food products that make health claims. These food products must first have a package, which should be our first clue..
It has been an interesting journey. I encourage you to take a look at our modern American diet, and the diseases that are unique to our time... Pollan posits that these are related, and I'm willing to believe that he's really on to something.


Here are Pollan's "Rules":

Eat Food: Food Defined
  1. Don't eat anything your great grand-mother wouldn't recognize as food
  2. Avoid food products containing ingredients that are a) unfamiliar, b) unpronounceable, c) more that five in number, or that include d) high-fructose corn syrup
  3. Avoid food products that make health claims
  4. Shop the peripheries of the supermarket and stay out of the middle
  5. Get out of the supermarket whenever possible
Mostly Plants: What to Eat
  1. Eat mostly plants, especially leaves
  2. You are what what you eat eats too (the diet of the animals we eat has a bearing on the nutritional quality, and healthfulness, of the food itself, whether it is meat or eggs)
  3. If you have the space, buy a freezer (So you can buy quality food in quantity when it is available)... I have concerns about this from an energy perspective. I'll have to think about this one, though.
  4. Eat well-grown food from healthy soils ("Organic" is not the last word on how to grow well)
  5. Eat wild foods when you can
  6. Be the kind of person who takes supplements (not necessarily TAKE the supplements; be the kind of person who would: be more health-conscious, better educated, more affluent. So be the kind of person who would take supplements, then save your money)
  7. Eat more like the French, or the Italians, or the Japanese, or the Indians, or the Greeks (Eat according to the rules of a traditional food culture. There are two dimensions to this: what a culture eats, and how they eat them. Both are relevant.)
  8. Regard nontraditional foods with skepticism (i.e. all the funky ways Americans now eat soy. We actually now eat more soy than the Japanese or Chinese do!)
  9. Don't look for the magic bullet in the traditional diet (In the same way that foods are more than the sum of their nutrient parts, dietary patterns seem to be more than the sum of the foods taht comprise them.)
  10. Have a glass of wine with dinner
Not Too Much: How to Eat
  1. Pay more, eat less (higher quality)
  2. Eat meals
  3. Do all your eating at a table (no, a desk is not a table)
  4. Don't get your fuel from the same place your car does (gas stations now make more money selling food than gasoline...but it's highly processed food)
  5. Try not to eat alone (because we tend to eat more when we're alone)
  6. Consult your gut (stop when you're full, not when the container is empty)
  7. Eat slowly
  8. Cook and, if you can, plant a garden
I'm very interesting in seeing the film Food, Inc., which definitely belongs in this conversation... I have requested it at our local library, but so have many other people, so it'll be a while.

20th Century - Bloodiest or most peaceful in history?

, said that the 20th century was the bloodiest in human history.

The 20th century was the bloodiest in human history. In Humanity: A Moral History of the 20th Century, Jonathan Glover estimates that 86,000,000 people died in wars fought from 1900 to 1989. That means 2,500 people every day, or 100 people every hour, for 90 years.
In addition to those killed in war, government-sponsored genocide and mass murder killed approximately 120,000,000 people in the 20th century—perhaps more than 80,000,000 in the two Communist countries of China and the Soviet Union alone, according to R. J. Rummel's Statistics of Democide.
I've heard Tony Campolo and others quote this from time to time, and was willing to believe it. I had no reason to question it. Sounded pretty logical.

I also believe that things are going to get worse and worse and human history goes on (i.e. the Biblical book of Revelation), rather than better and better until we reach utopia.

However, as I have recently been enjoying several talks from the TED conference podcast, I've been exposed to many new, fun, and intriguing ideas in many subject areas.
This TED talk, given by Steven Pinker, makes one wonder, or at least gives one some historical perspective and some additional things to consider. The comment thread at the bottom of the link above has an interesting dialogue...

So, was the 20th Century the bloodiest or the most peaceful in human history? I don't know. What I do know is that this sinful, fallen world is a mess. It always has been, even since the Fall of Humanity.





Sunday, January 24, 2010

Language... What will heaven be like?

So I've been thinking about language from God's perspective, and I've come up with several questions and ideas that I hadn't previously considered. I'll just throw them out, here, and see what you think...

1. Tower of Babel: God created the concept of multiple languages at the Tower of Babel. He did this to frustrate humanity's plans, so my understanding/assumption is that multiple languages were originally necessary because of our arrogance and power.

2.  Speaking in tongues: Turned on its head, these same two problems are addressed when God gives people the gift of tongues. People are able to very quickly, or instantly, overcome the language barrier. I wonder.... Since God is gifting it, I would assume that He is bestowing His power to bring glory to Himself, or the gift would not exist. Also, the vessel of this gift (the person speaking in tongues) would not have issues with arrogance, or (again) the gift would cease.

However, I do not have experience with the gift of tongues, so I may be way off here. Paul talks in the Corinthians about people abusing their spiritual gifts, so I don't know...
I do know someone who's a Bible translator, and this helps me imagine absolutely appropriate ways this gift would be used, ... again, connected with the idea of arrogance and power.

3. In Heaven: Here, I have mainly questions... What language will we speak? What language will we understand? Just one? Several? All of them? A new one that no one speaks now?

The need for a Tower of Babel-type frustration of human effort because of our arrogance and power will be irrelevant, because we will be perfect. There will be no sin, selfishness, arrogance, or inappropriate power! We will have much more power than we have now; we will be (and are) sons and daughters of God; we will rule with Him; etc, etc.

This side of heaven, miscommunication is often the culprit for countless pain and tears. This is true in marriage, at work, politically, and in every area of life. This happens when the participants are speaking the same language! Since there will be no pain or tears in heaven, I have to think that language difficulties will not exist, then.

However, I wonder about all the millions of people whose job it is to translate, teach language, etc. What will they do in heaven? I believe that we will still work, most likely in the area in which we have become most passionate about here on earth. Carpenters will probably be building mansions, or whatever. Singers will certainly be singing to God. Other jobs are more difficult, though. What will tax accountants do?
Now for my topic here. What will people whose job is immersed in language do? What about the beauty of the different languages, and how we can have fellowship across different languages.

Most of this is beyond our ability to imagine and comprehend.

I remember in my classes in college, one of the language profs said something light about how the Tower of Babel is responsible for her job. This was very interesting, but incidental to the task of the day. Only recently did I consider following that train of thought as far as I have here...

Anyone have any answers? Leave a comment. This is fascinating stuff!

Thursday, January 14, 2010

If you're green, you're growing!

"As long as you're green, you're growing. As soon as you're ripe, you start to rot.” - Ray Croc

My principal shared this with us in the context that we're all growing... He doesn't expect anyone to be perfect, and he doesn't ever put irrational or unkind pressure on any of us. He just wants us to continue to grow, as he, in fact, is doing, as well. A good place to be.

By the way, a few minutes earlier, our superintendent shared a version of this idea - a quote from one of his mentors: "If you think you're good, you're dead."

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

The LEARN Act - What really IS the best way to teach reading?

Here, Susan Ohanian quotes a letter sent by Stephan Krashen to the Congressional sponsors of the LEARN Act.
Conversations like this always make me wonder... What research really counts, and what "research" is merely opinion couched in authoritative-, academic-, and scholarly-sounding language?

Krashen says that the LEARN Act is "Reading First on steroids". He goes on to list lots of reasons why the money is misplaced. That we should instead be investing time and money in having kids READ instead of going overboard on direct instruction of phonics, etc. I was glad to see that he made a distinction between Intensive Systematic Phonics, Basic Phonics, and Zero Phonics. (He advocates Basic Phonics.)
INTENSIVE SYSTEMATIC PHONICS
phonics taught in sequence
all "major" rules
all rules consciously learned
reading = practice of learned rules

BASIC PHONICS
no optimal sequence
consciously learn only basic rules
most rules subconsciously acquired from reading
reading = source of most phonics knowledge

ZERO PHONICS
all rules subconsciously acquired
reading = source of all phonics knowledge

He says that the LEARN Act insists on Intensive Systematic Phonics, and most of what he says in the letter opposes this. However, he clarifies by saying that he is NOT in favor of Zero Phonics.

Interesting conversation, which I presume will not be over any time soon...

Sunday, January 10, 2010

More YouTube tricks

Just ran across this website (via Twitter tweet) about more things you can do to use YouTube videos.
  1. View high quality videos
  2. Embed higher quality videos
  3. Cut to the chase and link to the interesting part
  4. Hide the search box
  5. Embed only part of a video
  6. Autoplay an embedded video
  7. Loop an embedded video
  8. Disable Related Videos
  9. Bypass YouTube Regional Filtering
  10. Download Video
I would add http://youtubekeep.com/ to their #10, as well as Zamzar.com